This week, the sentencing court of 31 people in crimes such as murder in the 2002 post-Godhra riots in Gujarat makes it clear that it was Prime Minister of India Prime Minister Narendra Modi ever. It would be silly to try to-point channel to the prevailing anti-Congress feelings around the country that shows no failure in the near future to this selfish person. Every act of Modi shows that he has no doubts about the death of 1,000 Indians in those clashes, is really a case of contempt for the generosity shown towards Muslims, as evidenced by its rapid (Anna Hazare to try to fit an effective tool for the anti-Congress), when he refused to use the cap provided by a Muslim.
In fact, what could be more evidence that it was not easy and the cost of political gestures to apologize for post-Godhra riots? If Modi believes that the absence of evidence of a chain of guilt for technical reasons will be enough, have another coming. And no matter how compromised the credibility of the police officer may be Sanjiv Bhatt, the government's attempts to discredit Modi reflect clumsy attempts of the Congress Party to discredit the team of Anna Hazare is.
As the aggression and ruthlessness modes of appeal that part of the class average Indian, who feels the time has come to India kicks up a gear, not based on most of the Indians, and no one can become prime minister if appeal to the majority of Indians (we do not have the direct election of mail, but also pre-or post-query interruption, regional leaders will think twice before picking up the fortune of this man). India Inc can not stop gushing like Modi is a man of the future, and how he or she is to take India to the next phase of rapid economic growth, but these are controversial assertions. I wonder if in Gujarat, which has traditionally seen high economic activity in India would grow without Modi at the helm. I also wonder how many Gujarati industry leaders are willing to admit that their success is due to the growth and Modi.
In all cases, crony capitalism and corporate complicity in the corruption of high prices in recent years are proof of some of India Inc. in India really cares.
Those who believe that Modi is the man to save the nation, Congress should also consider the alternative proposed by U.S. presidential elections come. President Barack Obama has unfortunately had to take a position at a time when the world economy has sputtered and faces of other "lost years". His leadership has been caught by his constituents and all of the above of his being a president's term - if it faces a strong opponent. The problem is that Republicans do not seem to be able to find a strong candidate to take on Obama. In the period before the primary process, every Republican candidate seems ridiculous and not for another. An analogy may be apt Narendra Modi is Rick Perry of Indian politics. Unless Rick Perry does not preside over the murder of nearly a thousand residents of Texas.
Congress Party is vulnerable because of its own misdeeds, from the nuclear deal, which was pushed by parliament with the votes that have purchased the eyes on the looting of the country, the 2G scam. Anna Hazar showed widespread public disgust that exists for the government of the UPA, the character assassination of members of the team of Anna can remove personnel, but not disgust the public. How is the public nausea that voters are willing to tolerate a timid and unimaginative senior minister Prithviraj Chavan Maharashtra is as pure as it is a study of DNA has shown this week. The opposition parties need to think about maximizing the potential on the horizon, but the available evidence, it does not seem an easy task. The BJP has overestimated its own strength and ability to provide an alternative.
The fact that some of its more worthy still believe that 84 years, LK Advani Rath Yatra is a candidate h, despite the fact that he led a campaign to lose in 2009, shows the bankruptcy of their political strategy.
India has had several experiences with non-Congress, non-BJP government, but did not last the course. This is not a future experience, too, will. But regional parties must work together for the year 2012 in two stages: UP elections and the presidential election in India. Mayawati looks set to decide in the first maybe you should take the initiative to develop alternative strategies in the upcoming parliamentary elections. (I do not give importance to the anti-caste Mayawati reports in our media, and voters do not believe that either.) And the other, if Mamata, Jayalalithaa, Nitish, etc., should follow their example. Far better to be deceived to follow the example of Modi, because theirs is a path to nowhere in a hurry.
» Read More...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Barack Obama The path to reelection in 2012 is likely to be narrower than in his first season, it could lose several traditionally Republican states, captured in 2008.
Obama expanded dramatically in the political arena in 2008, competing and winning in states that have not supported a Democratic presidential candidate in a generation, but the card next year could be more like President George W. the reelection of Bush 's narrow victory over Democrat John Kerry 2004.
The sputtering economy and discontent with his leadership fell on his popularity nationwide, hitting particularly hard in conservative countries such as North Carolina, Indiana and Virginia, in 2008, which broke Democratic losing streak dating back to 1960.
The high unemployment and declining industry has also helped his poll numbers down to a traditional Rust Belt battlegrounds such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which are crucial to his hopes of gathering 270 electoral votes needed to reelection.
Obama won 365 electoral votes are awarded on a state by state basis, a smashing victory in 2008, which gave him 95 electoral votes to spare. This time his margin of error is smaller, "said Quinnipiac University Peter Brown interview.
"He has a shock, but much more than in 2008," said Brown. "It's hard to see, given the current situation, states Obama victory in 2012 has not won in 2008. The question is: How many states have more to lose?"
The Obama campaign has pledged to push hard to compete in states like North Carolina and Virginia, where he was helped last time by a large turnout among blacks. In a sign of commitment, the designated Democratic Convention held in Charlotte, North Carolina.
E 'was chosen over St. Louis, Missouri - Obama narrowly lost the state in 2008 that many Democrats believe has moved further towards the Republicans. Indiana conservative seems even less likely to accept Obama.
Republicans scored significant gains in Congress and governor races last year on worries the economy and deficit, and Republican strategists say Obama will campaign harder in 2012 to sell his story about spending and health care.
different campaign
"The last time, Obama could be elected for inspiration - he moved from Washington, has a new kind of leader, it was not George Bush," said Republican Jim Dyke strategic.
"There was not much of a record to judge him on and will be different this time," he said. "There's always this rhetoric in his voice, but his hands are full of some very strong political views, which will be explained."
Besides the traditional big three battlegrounds - Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida - Nevada and Colorado will be decisive in the hope of Obama.
These two western states and New Mexico are home to large Hispanic populations that Democrats hope to create a bastion of the West in 2012. Some Democrats hope to add to the mix of Arizona.
Obama has increased its thrust on the election campaign, immigration reform, despite a slight chance for congressional approval before the election. Polls show Republican resistance, the problem is taken care of Hispanic support for Democrats.
"No matter who is on the ticket, Republicans will struggle in 2012 with Latino voters," said Simon Rosenberg, president of the Democratic advocacy group NDN. Hispanics may also have an impact on Florida, North Carolina, Virginia and be a factor in some other states, he said.
Video where the Obama campaign boss Jim Messina last month showed defend Obama won 12 states in 2008, less than 15 percentage points - Nevada, Iowa, Colorado, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Indiana, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Virginia, North Carolina and Florida.
In 2004, Democrat Kerry won only four of them - Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire.
"The Republicans are going to be fired up to President Obama," Messina said the video, which is sent to Obama supporters. "This is not 2008."
The redistribution of electoral votes based on the 2010 census also spend a few votes in Republican-leaning states. In 2008, Obama has won eight of 10 states lose seats.
The persistently high unemployment rate will also be vital to hopes of Obama, and several key battlegrounds of 2012 have unemployment rates above the national average of 9 percent.
Nevada, where the flow of new residents and growth of the Hispanic population Obama has made profit for 2008 is the highest unemployment rate stood at 11.9 percent. Florida and North Carolina also have unemployment rates above 9 percent.
Rosenberg said that the political map should have a strong impact on how cheap the next 18 months.
"After a year if the economy is in good condition, Obama can be elected. If not, does not. It 's so simple," he said.
For more information, visit @ http://worldtop10news.blogspot.com/
» Read More...
